The Viking Age

 The Viking Age

The Dark Ages.....was it really so dark? was there a national shortage of candles? The simple answer is no.


The term came about because of how little we actually know about the period in comparison to the ancient world before (such as the Roman Empire and the periods after it) This is mainly because during that time very few people wrote things down, other than a few Christian and Arabian scholars. Although the Vikings did have a written form in the Runes, this was not used for writing down in books and so trying to understand. What is now often termed the "Early Medieval Period" when referring to the age of the Vikings is like trying  to look at 400 years or so of history through a tiny keyhole.


Despite these limitations there have been great advancements in knowledge over the last 100 years or so both in terms of scholarly research and in archaeology. From these distance fragments we can start to paint a picture of how people lived during those times   

Bedforshire in the Early Middle Ages 

The indigenous early people of Bedfordshire far back in prehistory were the same people whose contempories built Stonehenge. Britain was then known in earliest records as Alba or Alban, and the people as Albans. The Albans eventually pushed out by the invading Celtic tribes, in this area the established tribe being the Catuvellauni,.This tribe built under their King Cunobellinus, a great earthen embankment, to mark their territorial boundary across the Chiltern escarpment. When built this was up to six feet high and twenty feet deep with a similar sized ditch. This is Grim's ditch, and is also called Devil's dyke. Grim or Grimes, is an Anglo-Saxon name for the devil, and in Anglo-Saxon times it was believed to have been built by the devil.

These Celtic dwellers of Bedfordshire had to make way for the invading Romans,who stayed for nearly four hundred years. On the departure of the Romans, the Romano-British inhabitants of Bedfordshire were then over time, subjected to Germanic invaders. These invaders from a variety of Western European areas later became collectively known as the Anglo-Saxons, and the areas of Britain they conquered as England. The debate still continues if this was a large scale migration with the genocide of the British population, or was it more of a take over by an 'English' elite between 400-600AD? tThis is when we enter what has been termed 'The Dark Ages', dark in terms of desperate warfare and of the lack of written records, rather than in the lack of art, religion or social structure. They are also now referred to as the 'Early Medieval period'. Main areas of settlement for the Anglo-Saxons were the previously occupied river valleys of the Ouse and Ival and the Icknield way. Indeed the period covered by Wryngwyrm (AD800-1066), was a period of continuous conflict and warfare involving amongst others, the original Celtic inhabitants, the northern Picts, the English, the Vikings and lastly the Normans.

Bedfordshire as a county was not created until the 10th century under the great administrative advances of the Anglo-Saxons king, Edward the Elder.

The discovery of early Saxon brooches in Luton, suggests that in this area was situated one of the earliest English settlements in Britain, possibly in the early 5th century, as part of the forces brought over by Vortigern, the Romano-British high king, who used the 'barbarians', to help defend against Pictish raiders and possibly maintain his hold on power

At Luton is Wauluds bank, a Neolithic site older than Stonehenge, and sadly neglected by modern councils, so it is now almost insignificant. It was used in many periods through history, in the Anglo- Saxon period became a fortified encampment, It is on the site  of five springs that form the source of the river Lea. It is reputed in legend to be where Lugh, the celtic god drank from and which gave him his powers. Hence the name Lughston, or Luton

The early English sites in Bedfordsire included Dunstable, Sandy and Kempston. These may have been garrisons to protect the Icknield way. Larger forces of English under Hengst were garrisoned at Kent, and it was from here that the first English rebellion exploded in AD440. The small inland pockets of English maintained thier existance at this time but did not expand-this may be due to the still large and functioning Romano-British site at modern day St Albans. On a Roman farmstead at Dunstable, a Saxon warrior  was buried beside the upper summer track of the Icknield way. The underside of his skull was stove in, smashed by a blunt instrument before he was buried, and with him was a broken spear with out a point. He was buried hardly later than the 5th century, for by the second half of the 6th century, a Saxon village cemetery occupied the site, and later burials cut into the grave of this forgoten warrior. Was this an area of the war zone,  were the Romano-British leader Ambrosius (who preceded the legedary Arthur), led the British calvalry forces in resistance, in the mid to late 5th century? We can only imagine. A very large English burial ground at Kempston has provided more Saxon grave goods than almost any site in Britian. There are goods from the 5th century, late 6th century but nothing of the early 6th. This gap is at the time of the suggested peace, bought about by British victories under 'Arthur' The Anglo-Saxon chronicles remeber the destruction of a British army near Bedford (Biedcanford) in AD 571  and the Saxon occupation of Limbury and Aylesbury. They followed their victory by marching through the vale of Aylesbury to the Thames (the date 571 crops up again in this text). This does show that the British clung to the Bedford area and held out for a long time. There are sources in Welsh poems that mention a south midlands state and an army of Englishmen. Late medieval Welshmen believed this area to have included Dunstable and Northampton.

Both of these towns lie within the Roman 'Civitas' of the Catuvellauni, who's capital was Verulanium (St Albans)  where sophisticated Roman building techniques carried on to the end of the 5th century or later  suggesting a largely Romano-British population which as previously stated  probably suppressed the expansion of nearby English Dunstable. The Saxon chronicles record the victory of AD571  and names the English leader as Cuthwulf  who is possibly a leader of the Eslingas of southwestern Cambridgeshire. Another source states that Cuthwulf may have been co-king or general of the west Saxons. In the process of his victory he destroyed a once powerful British kingdom and opened up the whole of the midlands to the free movement of the English. This was part of the second Enlish revolt that led to the collapse of Celtic Britain. Another source I read  mentioned a battle being fought for Limbury in 571 (Cuthwulf again)  as Saxon Wessex expanded it's territories at the expense of other English kingdoms. For most of it's English history Bedfordshire formed part of the kingdom of Mercia. Burials and grave goods suggest that the Icknield way was populated by Saxons but the Jutes, Angles, Saxons, Frisians and other Germanic peoples were not confined to one region of Britain. Some of the ealiest grave goods are 'cruciform' or 'saucer' brooches - these have been found in Bedford and Luton. King Offa (AD757-96) of Mercia also held the title of 'Bretwalda'. Bretwalda was a title given to a small number of kings who held dominance over several English kingdoms during their reign. King Offa was held in such high status and regard that he was treated as an equal with the famous King Charlemange. Offa was the first king on record to use the title 'King of the English' and be treated as such by the arbiters of Europe. Offa was well known for his ruthlessness especially in matters concerned with his succession. His son Ecgfrith, succeeded him but died in the same year, then Coenwulf was Mercian king (AD796-821) but his death in Wales with his war band led to dynastic infighting that destroyed the power of Mercia and aided the rise of Wessex. In the 790s, a fortified town, north of the river (and within Bedford's present location), was established by King Offa.

This secured Offa's eastern border and was an important trading center. Bedford south of the river had to wait until planned building by another king - Edward the Elder in AD915. It has been suggested that as it was an important river crossing as Bedford was an crucial part of the defence system set up by King Offa. The 'ford' at Bedford, may have been replaced in Offa's time by a bridge. In fact, Bedford's place name derives from 'Bede's Ford'. This indicates that there was a river crossing here from early times of English settlement. A document called the Tribal Hildage, probably compiled during Offa's reign, lists four English tribes in Bedfordshire. The 'Hersingas' occupied roughly the north - so for any Saxon Wryngwyrm's this is your tribe! The 'Gifla' (people of Ival) occupied the east, the 'Giltern-Saetan' the south and the 'Anecung-ga the west. The crossing was situated where the present town bridge is and the roads north and south used to radiate out from it. King Offa, whilst returning from his newly founded abbey at St Albans, was taken ill and died at Offley, near Hitchin, on the 29th July 796. His body was taken to Bedford and interned in a chapel on the banks of the river Great Ouse. Unfortunately the river flooded and the chapel, together with Offa's remains, was washed away forever. A talking point with the public is this little known fact that Bedford was the scene of a royal burial. Offa's widow Cynethryth later presided as Abbess at the monastery in Bedford (charter of 796) In AD796 Coenwulf, the new king of Mercia, followed Offa in that he engaged in military campaigns against the Welsh (Britons) and other English kingdoms. The men of Bedfordshire would have been involved and tied into military service to their king. By the end of the 8th century Bedford was an important religious centre with two major churches, St Paul and St Peter's. In AD829 the Wessex king Egbert  invaded Mercia (including Bedfordshire). In 830 , King Wiglaf regained Mercian control of their territory. In 874 the eastern part of the kingdom of Mercia, which included Bedfordshire, submitted to Danish force and became part of Danish East Anglia. In 874, part of a large Viking army under the command of three Danish kings (including Guthrum) took up winter quarters in Cambridge and raided the surrounding countryside. The Vikings stayed in Cambridge for a year and under Guthrum's leadership built up their army. In 894 a Viking army traveled up the river Lea and built a fortress, believed to be at Hertford. A Mercian army from London and surrounding counties assaulted the fortress but failed to take it. In 895 a second attempt was made by King Alfred to take the fortress but the Viking escaped. It is well documented and known by many of us from school history lessons, how Alfred, King of Wessex (AD871-99), fought back against almost total Danish conquest of England and at Edington decisively defeated the Danish leader Guthrum. Bedford was presumably under Danish control at this time. Between AD886-890 Alfred and Guthrum established a boundery between English and Danish territories. The boundery ran through Bedfordshire, making the area a real frontier area that changed hands many times, with Bedford being a predominantly English garrisoned town.


The boundary ran from the Thames, up the river Lea to it's source in Luton (Marsh farm), then in a straight line north to Bedford. Then along the river Ouse to the old Roman road of Watling street. This boundery became known as the Danelaw and different laws would have applied in different parts of Bedfordshire depending on whether you lived in English settled areas or areas that were predominantly settled by the Danes. This accounts for different archaeological finds in the east of Bedfordshire, which was within the Danelaw. The boundary deliberately takes a big deflection to take in Bedford and it is the only town mentioned in the treaty. This was to ensure that this strategically significant town remained in English hands. We can only imagine how the English settlers of eastern Bedfordshire felt, as Guthrum would have rewarded his followers with extensive grants of land, leaving many local land owning thegns dispossesed. Under Alfred's laws, drawn up to enforce relations between the two states, the wergild (blood price) of a man was substantially increased to deter fights between the two sides. The boundery suggests that Alfred made a deliberate decision to include Bedford in the treaty boundary, possibly therefore making it's status hanceforth that of a garrison town. Bedford was therefore one of Alfred's Burh's. A Burh was designated as having every 'pole' of defence perimeter to be defended by four men and every man to be backed up by support of one hide of land. The perimeter was estimated at between 250 and 350 poles. This would require between 1,000 to 1,400 men to defend it. Evidence suggests that after a short interval, as little as seven years, the Danes had crossed the Danelaw and re-occupied Bedfordshire and Buckinghamshire. Bedford then remained in Danish hands until November 915, as part of the Danish kingdom of York, when it was re-occupied by Edward the Elder, who was a son of Alfred and the royal line of Wessex. Coins of Danish and Anglo Saxon origin have been found in Bedford. At this time Bedford was known as Bedanforda and was situated on the north side of the river. When the town surrenderd to King Edward he had a broad ditch and rampart constructed on the south side. As part of the plan he re-aligned the roads that formerly headed straight towards the bridge to head to a central crossroads instead. King Edward founded St Mary's church at this time, right in the middle of the area enclosed by the ditch. The Danes at Bedford were commanded by Jarl Thurketel, who submitted to Edward with a large number of his followers. King Edward spent four weeks in the area of Bedford and as I have stated above constructed his own Burh on the south bank of the river, to keep the Danish fortress under observation. So we have English and Viking troops at the same time within the boundery of modern Bedford! Edward had left a force of troops at Bedford to monitor the obedience of Thurketel. In 916, Thurketel and his followers left England for the continent, possibly to join the Danish settlement of Normandy, taking place at that time. This henceforth strengthened the rule of the West Saxons in Bedfordshire.


The Anglo Saxon Chronicles have a number of church records that chronicle events at that time. In 917 it records ' and they (the Danes), went until they reached Bedford, and the men who were inside, went out against them and fought them and fought them, and put them to flight, and killed a good many of them'. This was just two years after Edward had recovered Bedford.


In AD917, a Danish army from Huntingdon and parts of East Anglia advanced into Bedfordshire to Tempsford and constructed a new fortress from which they launched the attempt to recover Bedford. Edward is recorded as having assembled a force from his frontier Burh's, and stormed the East Anglian Danish camp at Tempsford where he won a resounding victory, killing the Danish king. The Danes lost a large number of men, so our soil has indeed witnessed big battles with heavy casualties. We can see that Bedford is rich in history of battles and skirmishes between the English and the Danes. In 917 the Abbot of Bedford was named Thurcytel and had a brother, Oscytel, who was Abbot of York. Both of these appear to be Danes but no longer pagan!

 A charter of King Athelstan reveals that King Edward (Wessex) and King Aethelred (Mercia), had commanded their faithful Thegn Eldred to buy land worth ten pounds at Chalgrave and Tebworth from the pagan Viking occupying it. Such policies encouraged the English nobles that they would benefit from reconquest of territory.

More viking history wil be addded to this page over time.

© Copyright Wryngwyrm 2018. All Rights Reserved.